Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1982No. 12-81-0104-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Justice.

Appellant Raymond Clay Boyd was convicted by a jury of theft over $200 and less than $10,000. The jury assessed punishment at confinement for eight years, probated. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the trial court coerced the jury into re*858turning a verdict at the punishment phase of the trial by giving an “Allen charge” or “dynamite charge.”

The record reflects that the jury deliberated on the issue of punishment from 6:10 p.m. to 7:35 p.m. on August 24, 1978, at which time they were allowed to separate for the night. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Arrevalo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Calicult v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Love v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1981
  5. Stanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armstead v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
  2. Jeremy Shane Cox v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
  3. Jeremy Shane Cox v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
  4. Marc Anthony Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API