Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Isaac Joseph Iron Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 14, 1922No. 2719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Charles P. Orr, Judge. Action at law by the Isaac Joseph Iron Company against Henry Hirsch, doing business as the Contractors’ Machinery & Supply Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

' THOMPSON, District Judge.

The Isaac Joseph Iron Company, plaintiff below, hereafter referred to as the plaintiff, and Henry Hirsch, doing business as Contractors’ Machinery & Supply Company, defendant below, hereafter referred to as the defendant, on March 7, 1918, entered into a contract, through letters and telegrams, by the terms of which the defendant agreed to make immediate delivery to the plaintiff of 1,000 tons of 56-pound relaying rails with angle bars, subject to the Pittsburg Testing Laboratory inspection, for the price of $55 per ton f. o. b. Durbin, W. Va. The plaintiff sued to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Cleveland Rolling Mill v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Cable v. United States Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  4. McFarland v. Savannah River Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howard & Foster Co. v. CumminsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hooter v. FarrarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Michel v. EffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  4. Michel v. EffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API