Legal Opinion
Virtue v. Danbury State Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 14, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoeling, J.
The defense is grounded principally on a rule of defendant bank adopted and prominently posted in its lobby about one month before it received the check in controversy. The rule, so far as material, is:
"In receiving checks, drafts or other items for collection or for credit, this bank acts only as its customer’s agent. All items are received at owner’s risk, and, if credited, shall be credited’ conditionally, subject to payment, and may be charged back at any time until the proofs thereof, in money, have been actually received by this bank. * * * This bank may accept for the account of its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Wells v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Leach v. Battle Creek Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Dempster Manufacturing Co. v. DownsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams County v. Meadows Valley BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Thompson v. Cedar Rapids National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929