Legal Opinion

Scott v. Mayor of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the co-urt was delivered by

Hendrickson, J.

The plaintiff in error brought suit against the defendant city to recover the amount of an annual pen*688sion, which she claimed to be due her upon the death of her husband while serving as a hoseman of engine company No. 1 in the lire department of Jersey City. The action was based upon the second section of an act entitled “An act providing for the pensioning of firemen in certain cities of this state” (Pamph. L. 1897, p. 263), which reads as follows: “If any officer or man permanently emploj'ed in any fire department in any such city…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crouse v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Leffingwell v. KierstedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. Renz v. Hibbing Firemen's Relief Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. Board of TrusteesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Mack v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API