Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Stolz
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 9, 1925No. 1172. [fn*]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.
Appellee, as plaintiff below, brought this suit in the district court of Jefferson county, Tex., to recover a balance due him on the purchase price of a certain monument or mausoleum constructed by appellee on appellant’s burial lot situated in the Port Arthur cemetery at Port Arthur, Tex., under the following written contract:
Contract.
$7200.00 and monument on lot. 10% Earnest
Agent's No. --. money due on
Date, 3/15 1920. April 1st, 1920.
County of Jefferson, Cos. No. -
State of Texas. Received -.
Bldg. Complete
Apr. 22, 1921.
Shipped Cd. 720.00.
This is to certify that I have this day bought of L.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. AchesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Hutchinson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hines v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Leonard v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Phillips v. Rector & Visitors of the University of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State v. Forest Lawn Lot Owners Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- McAnally v. Friends of WCC, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- United Cemeteries Co. v. StrotherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Amegy Bank National Ass'n v. Brazos M & E, Ltd. (In Re Bigler LP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.