Industrial Commission v. Murphy

BY THE COURT

We have examined the bill of exceptions and find that there was no error in the rulings of the trial court upon the admissibility of evidence. We find also that the trial court did not err in refusing to give the special charge nor was there error in the gezzoral charge of the court. The remaining question relates to the sufficiency of the evidence.

Murphy testified that he had been eznployed by the city of Columbus continuously for twelve years; that late in the afternoon of January 3, 1930, in the course of his employzncnt he was lifting some heavy mud from the street and…