Gonzales v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentCadena, Chief Justice
The indictment alleges that the habitation was “within the City of San Antonio.” The majority opinion concludes that the indictment is fundamentally defective because it fails to allege that the City of San Antonio is an “incorporated” city.
As the Court of Criminal Appeals pointed out in Noble v. State, 18 S.W.2d 619, 620 (Tex.Crim.App.1929), a city is an “incorporated town.” There is no such thing as an *84“unincorporated” city. The Texas Supreme Court said, as early as 1890, that it is a well-established historical fact that the City of San Antonio was established as a corporation in 1733.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Greenway Parks Home Owners Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Dittmar v. DignowittyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Greenway Parks Owners Association v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.