Legal Opinion

Kirsch v. 33 West 56th Street, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.

This is a motion to compel plaintiff to add an additional party defendant and to extend the time to answer. The action is to recover brokerage commission in connection with the sale of improved real propérty of which defendant was the seller. It was noted in the contract of sale by both the buyer and the seller that plaintiff brought about the sale and the seller (defendant) agreed to pay her the commission agreed upon by separate written agreement. Defendant is willing to pay the brokerage commission but states that another party claims a portion of the brokerage commission. It is evident…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bergman v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johns-Manville International Corp. v. Insul-Fil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API