Legal Opinion

Kefuss v. Whitley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 138Published

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The story of the transaction may be thus told: Mr. Kefuss was a resident of and had spent his lifetime in business in a small city, some considerable distance from Detroit. Through his relative, Mr. Cook, he had made some fortunate investments in Detroit real estate. While in Cook’s *76office on business connected therewith, McDonald appears and reveals to him how he may secure a profit of $100,000 on an investment of approximately $25,000. He prepared and delivered to him Exhibit 1, which reads as follows: ,

“EXHIBIT l.
“80 acres at $900 .............................$72,000
“Approx. $25,000 easA…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McDonald v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ansley v. Bank of PiedmontSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Cerny v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API