Legal Opinion
Smith v. Dodge & Bliss Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 21, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The controversy in this case arises under the Mechanics’ Lien law, in regard to materials furnished to one Anderson, a contractor, and used by him in the erection of a building for Sarah C. Smith, the complainant, under a contract duly filed.
The Dodge & Bliss Company claim the money payable under the contract to the contractor, Anderson, by virtue of notice served, under the third section of the Mechanics’ Lien law. Gen. Stat. p. 2073 pl. 38.
The Barnes Manufacturing Company claims the money under an order of which the following is a copy :
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bayonne Building Ass'n No. 2 v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Israel v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- JAS. FALCONE PLUMBING & HEATING CO. INC. v. PasqualeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Gazdayka v. GernatNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940