Legal Opinion

Tippens v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1938No. 8773PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit, on a policy of life insurance providing double indemnity for accidental death, was against the insurer for both single and double indemnity.

*672Brought by the administrator on behalf of the insured’s estate, the claim generally was that; one Annie Allen Ballard, living with insured as, but not legally, his wife, was, though not named as such, the real beneficiary of the policy; that, in a conspiracy with her mother, the nominal beneficiary, she had murdered the insured, and that therefore the insurer became obligated to the estate of the insured for both…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Smith v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Marlowe v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. State v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Holdom v. Ancient Order of United WorkmenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Schifanelli v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Mendez-Bellido v. BD. OF TR. OF DIV. 1181, ATUDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  4. California-Western States Life Insurance v. SanfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981
  5. General American Life Insurance Company v. ColeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API