Tippens v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit, on a policy of life insurance providing double indemnity for accidental death, was against the insurer for both single and double indemnity.
*672Brought by the administrator on behalf of the insured’s estate, the claim generally was that; one Annie Allen Ballard, living with insured as, but not legally, his wife, was, though not named as such, the real beneficiary of the policy; that, in a conspiracy with her mother, the nominal beneficiary, she had murdered the insured, and that therefore the insurer became obligated to the estate of the insured for both…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Smith v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Marlowe v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- State v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
- Holdom v. Ancient Order of United WorkmenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Schifanelli v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Mendez-Bellido v. BD. OF TR. OF DIV. 1181, ATUDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- California-Western States Life Insurance v. SanfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981
- General American Life Insurance Company v. ColeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.