Sittig v. Littell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the District Court, parish of St. Landry. Bailey, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
In this case judgment in solido was obtained against the two makers and the indorser of a promissory note, from which the two makers took this appeal by petition and asked that the plaintiff be cited. It is manifest that the indorser has an interest and should be a party to the appeal, and as this court will notice, of its own motion, the want of proper parties, the appeal must be dismissed. 12 R. 203 ; 4 A. 577; 11 A. 409; 12 A. 755, 774, 801; 3 A. 317; 19 A. 137.
It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed with costs.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mansfield v. FassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCutchen v. HudsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Chicago-Texas Land & Lumber Co. v. Sabine River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912