Legal Opinion
United States v. Certain Real Property
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1995No. 94-1640PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
The Claimants, Neal and Kathryn Duprie (“Dupries”) appeal the decision of the district court granting the Plaintiff-Appellee’s, the United States Government, motion for summary judgment and denying their motion to dismiss the forfeiture complaint filed against the Defendant-Appellant property, a residence located at 11869 West Shore Drive, Putnam Township, Livingston County, Michigan (“Property”). The granting of the government’s motion for summary judgment forfeited the Dupries’ interest in the Property. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM the district court’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. $67,220.00 in United States Currency, Robert N. Easterly, Jr., Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 6717 100th Street S.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- United States v. Certain Real Property Located At 11869 Westshore Drive, Putnam Township, Livingston County, Michigan, Together With All Of Its Fixtures, Improvements And Appurtenances, Kathryn DuprieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Hillman v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
- United States v. Real Property, Buildings, Appurtenances & ImprovementsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- United States v. One 1992 Isuzu Trooper Vin JACDH58W3N79112571District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999