Comstock v. Coronet Heating Supply Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From an order dismissing defendant’s second amended cross-complaint after sustaining of a demurrer thereto with leave to amend, of which leave' defendant did not avail itself, defendant appeals.
Facts: Defendant filed a second amended cross-complaint in two causes of action,* the first cause of action predicated upon plaintiff’s breach of a contract giving defendant the exclusive right to sell plaintiff’s product in a given area; the .second cause of action predicated upon the theory that plaintiff had breached its warranty with defendant guar*601anteeing that merchandise purchased from plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Judson Manufacturing Co. v. LutgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Hamberger-Polhemus Co. v. Hind, Rolph & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956