Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Coronet Heating Supply Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1952No. Civ. No. 19053PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From an order dismissing defendant’s second amended cross-complaint after sustaining of a demurrer thereto with leave to amend, of which leave' defendant did not avail itself, defendant appeals.

Facts: Defendant filed a second amended cross-complaint in two causes of action,* the first cause of action predicated upon plaintiff’s breach of a contract giving defendant the exclusive right to sell plaintiff’s product in a given area; the .second cause of action predicated upon the theory that plaintiff had breached its warranty with defendant guar*601anteeing that merchandise purchased from plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Judson Manufacturing Co. v. LutgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hamberger-Polhemus Co. v. Hind, Rolph & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API