Legal Opinion

State v. Keilen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2002No. 20020064-20020065, 20020066-20020067PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Matthew Keilen and Kristy Dyk-hoff appeal from their convictions for possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Each entered a conditional plea of guilty with a right to appeal the denial of the motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of entry into their apartment. Keilen and Dykhoff also argue the trial court made improper findings based on information outside of the record. The State argues any appeal was not properly preserved and the search falls within the community caretaker exception to the warrant requirement. The appeal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Kirk v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BoydNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. GuscetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Sand v. R.J.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API