Legal Opinion

BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC v. MITNICK LAW OFFICE, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 23, 2022No. 1:21-cv-20512Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff Civil No. 21-20512 (RBK/AMD) Vv. : OPINION MITNICK LAW OFFICE, LLC, et ai., Defendants. KUGLER, United States District Judge: Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts Two, Four, and Five of the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 21). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Balanced Bridge Funding LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Balanced”) brings this action against Defendants Mitnick Law…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API