Legal Opinion

Rolland v. Rolland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1946No. Docket No. 72, Calendar No. 43,320Published

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

George Roiland, who died on May 7, 1927, by will, duly probated, left the north 40 feet of lot 6 of block 1, Fay’s addition to the city of Flint, Michigan, to his son Samuel Rolland and Ella Rolland, the latter’s wife. He devised the balance of lot 6, on which the homestead stood, to his wife Cora Rolland, during her natural life, and upon her death to his sons Samuel and Henry Holland, share and share alike. He imposed the obligation on them to care for Cora Rolland, the life tenant during her lifetime. Cora Rolland continued to live in the homestead for two years and then made her home with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Page v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. James A. Welch Co. v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Krench v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API