Legal Opinion
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Weben Industries
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 13, 1985No. Civ. A. CA 3-83-0021-GPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FISH, District Judge.
Introduction
The remaining parties to this suit, Mercantile National Bank at Dallas and Mercantile Dallas Corporation (collectively “MNB”) and Conveyor, Machinery and Steel Erectors, Inc. (“CoMaster”), have filed cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The issues presented concern the priority rights of these adverse claimants to an interpleaded fund (“the contract fund”) deposited by United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) into the registry of this court in accordance with an agreed order approved by all…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- 1 Collier bankr.cas.2d 42, Bankr. L. Rep. P 67,033 Ralph I. Selby, Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Frimberger Corporation v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Georgia Pacific Corporation v. Sigma Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Rice Investment Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Nch Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Lynn N. Broyles, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Parcel Service, Inc., Etc. v. Weben Industries, Inc., and Conveyor, MacHinery & Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Mercantile National Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Sun Belt Electrical Constructors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
- Elorreaga v. ABB, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023