Legal Opinion
Bill Curphy Co. v. Lincoln Bonding & Insurance
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 23, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 16-52PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
Bornemeier, one of the two third party defendants, has moved to dismiss as to him the third party complaint, whose filing was earlier allowed by the court upon motion of the defendant made after answer and upon notice to the plaintiff. Rule 14(a), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. The motion to dismiss the third party complaint in its entirety is being denied. And the motion is directed at the third party complaint as a whole rather than at any part of it.
It is recognized by the contending parties that the allowance of third party procedure within Rule 14 and its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Baltimore & OR Co. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Sheppard v. Atlantic States Gas Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- General Taxicab Ass'n v. O'SheaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Morrell v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Sporia v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Duke v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Glens Falls Indemnity Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Swenson v. SuhlDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1956
- Wade v. PastorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.