Fritz v. Tudor
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 11 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Park on Dower, pp. 24, 31, 165. 7 Dana, 172; Wall vs. Dill. CITED— 2 Metcalfe, 408; Yancey vs. Smith. Section 125, Civil Code {Stanton), note,p. 94. 19 Barb., 219 ; Corwin vs. Corwin. Section 153, Civil Code.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered tiie opinion of the court:
The appellant insists that the circuit court erred to his prejudice in the allotment of dower to the appellee in a tract of land of 127 acres, held by him as sub-purchaser from her husband, without her concurrence in the sale and conveyance of it.
Although the preparation of the case has been irregular in some respects, yet, each party having had full opportunity to present all the essential facts, and having taken all needful testimony, a just decision may be reached on the record as now presented; and, therefore, this court will not notice…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kentucky River Consolidated Coal Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Commonwealth v. McCauley'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Hogg v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Bradley v. EllingsworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.