Legal Opinion

Jones v. Cendant Mortgage Corp. (In Re Jones)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 2008No. 19-10215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Defendants Cendant Mortgage Corporation (hereinafter Cendant) and United States Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter IRS) have brought motions to dismiss the respective counts asserted against them in the complaint in this adversary action.

Debtor opposes the motions to dismiss.

Defendants’ motions to dismiss will be granted. The question whether the debt owed to IRS is dischargeable is unaffected by the decision reached in this memorandum opinion. Whether it is dischargeable will be decided if and when the matter is brought before this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Commissioner v. SchleierSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morrison Informatics, Inc. v. Members 1st Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Richard Jahn v. Philip Craig BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Verdini, A. v. First National Bank of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Morrison Informatics, Inc. v. Members 1st Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API