Wilson v. House
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 36—PETITION EQUITY— APPEAL FROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT. ' CITED 1 Acts of 1871, page 5. CITED Revised Statutes (Myers’s Supplement), page 685. 4 Bush, 13, Stephens & Hermes v. Farrar Bros. 5 Bush, 601, Wood v. Anders.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE COFER
delivered the opinion of the court.
The act of the 26th of January, 1866, giving attorneys at law “ a lien upon any chose in action, account, or other claim put into their hands for suit or collection, and upon judgments in actions prosecuted by them to recovery where the judgment is for money,” does not apply to this case, because there was no chose in action or other claim put into appellee Hurt’s hands for collection, and no judgment for money was recovered. >
The act of the 21st of January, 1871 (1 Session Acts, 5), provides that when an attorney shall be employed by either *407the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Rice v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Harlan & Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Ford v. FallerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
- Stone v. DuBarryKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Atchison v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.