Legal Opinion

Kehoe-Berge Coal Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 24, 1941No. 7477PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

The facts and the legal question raised in this case are nearly the same as those raised in the Pittston-Duryea Coal Co. case, Pittston-Duryea Coal Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 117 F.2d 436, the opinion in which is filed this day. They differ, however, in one important particular. The taxpayer in the instant case filed its return for 1934 claiming a net loss in mining operations. No deduction for depletion was claimed in this return nor was any statement made regarding the basis for computing depletion. Sometime prior to October 3, 1936, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. E. Riley Investment Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pittston-Duryea Coal Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. Estate of Stamos v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Mother Lode Coalition Mines Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rosenfield v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Tonopah Mining Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API