Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Hoover

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1983No. 82 CA 0989Published

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge.

This is an action for personal injury resulting from a fall sustained by Roger D. Crowe, plaintiff, when he tripped backward. Made defendants are Howard Hoover, owner of the premises where the accident occurred and Prudential Insurance Company, homeowner’s insurer of Hoover. The trial court rendered judgment for defendant, dismissing plaintiff’s suit.

The facts indicate that Crowe was asked to go to the home of Hoover, his brother-in-law, to pick up some catfish. About an hour later, Crowe arrived at Hoover’s home in a pickup truck and parked his truck behind another truck…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. v. STATE FARM, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Duxworth v. Pat Caffey Contractor, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Duxworth v. Pat Caffey Contractor, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API