Beets v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
Heck v. Humphrey (1994) 512 U.S. 477, 486-487 [129 L.Ed.2d 383, 114 S.Ct. 2364] (Heck) holds that when a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a suit under title 42 of the United States Code section 1983 (section 1983) would necessarily imply the invalidity of the plaintiff’s underlying conviction or sentence, the complaint must be dismissed, unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that his conviction or sentence has been invalidated. In Yount v. City of Sacramento (2008) 43 Cal.4th 885, 902 [76 Cal.Rptr.3d 787, 183 P.3d 471] (Yount), our Supreme Court held that the same…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. SantamariaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Larson v. Barber CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016