Legal Opinion

Briscoe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1927No. 10345Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

in combating the legality of the action of the officers in using the list for the year 1925 in refilling the wheel, counsel adverts to the expressions in the opinion of this court in the case of McNeal v. State, 274 S. W. 983, from which we quote:

“The action of the court in filling the wheel in February, 1924, was intended to provide jurors for the year in substitution for those in the wheel as filled in August preceding. To have drawn the names of the proposed jurors from a different list than that used in filling the jury wheel in August…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. Reddick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Atwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Fortune v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Knott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API