Legal Opinion

Debourah Mattatall v. Transdermal Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 7, 2015No. 14-1614Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Early in the proceedings below, before discovery was conducted, the district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs breach of contract claims. The court held the claims were barred by a broadly worded release in a settlement agreement between the parties. The district court held the release was unambiguous and refused to consider extrinsic evidence purportedly clarifying the parties’ intent. Plaintiff insists the release is ambiguous and that extrinsic evidence showing the parties did not intend the release to encompass the instant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Butch Lewis Productions, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hampton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Carol Smith v. Perkins Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API