Legal Opinion

Ilangovan Govindarajan v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 5, 2015No. 11-71533Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Ilangovan Govindarajan petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals that he is removable because his convictions for six counts of aggravated assault under Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-1203(A)(3) and 13-1204(A)(8)(e) were for crimes involving moral turpitude (“CIMTs”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). Because Govindarajan’s convictions are not CIMTs, we grant the petition and remand.

The BIA concluded that Govindarajan’s convictions were not categorically CIMTs, and we agree. See Ceron v. Holder, 747 F.3d 773, 783 (9th Cir.2014) (en…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Galeana-Mendoza v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Latu v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API