Legal Opinion
Starks v. Lusk
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 22, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Stoddard Circuit Court. — Hon. W. 8. C. Walker, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.
This case is fully stated and elaborately discussed in the majority and dissenting opinions of the Springfield Court of Appeals (187:'S. W. 586 et seq).
After a careful examination of the facts as shown in the record, we are satisfied that a correct conclusion was reached in the majority opinion. We therefore approve the majority opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals.
The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, affirmed. It is._ so ordered.
All concur, except Goode and Graves, JJ., who dissent; Woodson, J., absent.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Henkrick v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Moffatt v. LinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
- Bailey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920