Legal Opinion

C.J.A. Corporation v. Trans-Action Financial

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 2001No. A086348PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALKER, J.

Trans-Action Financial Corporation, Robert Bisno, and James Coxeter appeal from the trial court’s order modifying a prior judgment for judicial foreclosure to allow respondent C.J.A. Corporation (CJA) to instead obtain a money judgment against appellants. We hold that because respondent unequivocally elected to proceed against appellants by way of judicial foreclosure, it was estopped from seeking to change its remedy after judgment. We further hold that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in modifying the judgment based upon matters that were never before it at trial.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bank of Amerika National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Ziello v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Orange County Water District v. City of ColtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Madigan v. Potrans International, Inc. (In Re Madigan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Preserve Poway v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC v. Montano (In Re Montano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Estate of Clark CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. In re: Jesus Edgar MontanoUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Linton v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API