Legal Opinion

Drewes v. Levine

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1985No. C1-85-141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Respondent previously appealed from the denial of his petition for discharge from commitment. Drewes v. Levine, 352 N.W.2d 456 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). We reversed for lack of factual findings, established the burden of proof to obtain discharge, and remanded. The parties then agreed a new petition for discharge would be heard de novo. The appeal panel ordered respondent discharged because he was not mentally ill and his dangerousness did not result from mental illness. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Drewes, a 49 year old man, was committed to the St. Peter Security…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. NootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Enebak v. NootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Reome v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Drewes v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Reome v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Piotter v. SteffenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Matter of BowersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In re El-RashadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Blank v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API