Legal Opinion

Fox v. Stanish

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1979No. 57825PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Chief Judge.

1. The Workers’ Compensation Act as first adopted and as it appeared in the Code of 1933, gave an option to both the employer and employee to reject its provisions, and former Code § 114-201 provided that the parties were presumed to have accepted the provisions of the Act unless notice as therein specified was given to the contrary. The present Code §§ 114-110, 114-111 on the contrary create a conclusive presumption of coverage unless otherwise specifically provided in the Act. Further, the original provision that an employer not operating under the Act was liable to an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Guaranty Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Elliott Addressing Machine Co. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Shaw v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Samuel v. BaitcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Helton v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Miles v. Brown Transport CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Guinn v. Conwood Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Samuel v. BaitcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API