Legal Opinion

State Highway Admin v. Brawner Builders

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 18, 2020No. 1643/19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Md. State Highway Administration v. Brawner, No. 1643, September Term 2019, Argument Date: 11/6/20 Procurement Law A subcontractor is entitled to make a contract claim against a procurement agency only if there is a direct contract between the claimant and that agency. The subcontractor had a contract with a contractor to provide materials on a state highway project. Although the state agency had approved the materials the subcontractor would use in state highway noise barrier wall, that did not suffice to create a contract between the subcontractor and the agency. As such, the subcontractor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. ARA Health Services, Inc. v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Science Applications International Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Engineering Management Services, Inc. v. Maryland State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. Ara Health Services, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brawner Builders v. State Highway Admin.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Small MS4 Coalition v. Dept. of EnvironmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Matter of the Petition of Md. Bio EnergyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Mistral, Inc. v. Skydax, LLC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API