Legal Opinion

Faris Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1969No. Appeals, 280, 281, 282 and 300PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The Redevelopment Authority of Altoona condemned appellants’ properties upon which the Authority filed an open-end bond. Appellants filed preliminary objections contending that, since the Authority had no power of taxation and that its financial resources were questionable, the bond filed was of “insufficient security.” The trial judge dismissed the preliminary objections without requiring an answer or holding a hearing. In so doing we feel that the lower court abused its discretion since a question of fact was raised by the preliminary objections as to the sufficiency of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Milford-Trumbauersville Area Sewer Authority v. Approximately 0.753 Acres of Land Known to be Property of McCarthyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Golden Dawn Shops, Inc. v. Philadelphia Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Riehl v. Millcreek Township Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Conway AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. In re Condemnation of Rights of Way & Easements Situate in the Township of North Huntingdon & the Township of HempfieldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API