Legal Opinion
McMahon v. Astrue
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 8, 2008No. Case CV 07-14-PHX-MHMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARY H. MURGUIA, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is David S. McMahon’s (“Plaintiff’) Application for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). (Dkt. # 16). After reviewing the pleadings, the Court issues the following Order.
I. BACKGROUND
This case came before the Court on Plaintiffs complaint for review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of Plaintiffs claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. 1 (Dkt. # 1). On August 15, 2007, the Court remanded this case to the Commissioner for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.