Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Crowdus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1915No. 8201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

John Roy Coleman and Clyde Seabrook, by next friend, sued to recover title and possession of lot 15, “Land 500,” in the city of Ft. Worth. Later they instituted a suit to'set aside a judgment and tax sale under which the defendant R. L. Crowdus, through mesne conveyances, claimed the lot in question. The two suits were consolidated and in a trial before the court without a jury judgment was rendered for the defendant Crowdus.

No conclusions of fact or of law were filed by the court, but the evidence on the controlling issues in the case is substantially undisputed. Omitting evidence which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clegg v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Lufkin v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Yenda v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Mote v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Eustis v. City of HenriettaTexas Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Denman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Gamble v. BanneyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Gibbs Bros. Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API