Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Catoe
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2002No. 02-7110Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, the court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), and the magistrate judge’s order denying discovery. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). “Lack of notice of the entry by the clerk does not…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Michelle La Nette Nunley v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation, Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Waymond B. McDaniel v. Michael W. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.