Legal Opinion

"Everett" v. "Everett"

New York Family Court

Decided December 19, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.

There is presented a distressing marital maladjustment which is not within the power of any court to cure and to which are relevant these words of Supreme Court Justice Hoestadter : “ In deciding issues such as this, involving intimate personal relations, we dimly perceive other underlying impulsions, the vague shape of things unseen — imponderables — emerging from the vagaries of the mind and conditioned by the fallibilities of the human heart; beyond our capacity, as frequently beyond our competent province, to evaluate precisely and resolve completely.” (Treherne-Thomas v. Treherne-Thomas,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Domb v. DombNew York Family Court · 1941
  2. Kramer v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Treherne-Thomas v. Treherne-ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. SullivanNew York City Family Court · 1966
  2. Manheim v. ManheimNew York Family Court · 1951
  3. " Posner " v. " Posner "New York Family Court · 1952
  4. Krakow v. KrakowNew York Family Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API