"Everett" v. "Everett"
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.
There is presented a distressing marital maladjustment which is not within the power of any court to cure and to which are relevant these words of Supreme Court Justice Hoestadter : “ In deciding issues such as this, involving intimate personal relations, we dimly perceive other underlying impulsions, the vague shape of things unseen — imponderables — emerging from the vagaries of the mind and conditioned by the fallibilities of the human heart; beyond our capacity, as frequently beyond our competent province, to evaluate precisely and resolve completely.” (Treherne-Thomas v. Treherne-Thomas,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Domb v. DombNew York Family Court · 1941
- Kramer v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Treherne-Thomas v. Treherne-ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. SullivanNew York City Family Court · 1966
- Manheim v. ManheimNew York Family Court · 1951
- " Posner " v. " Posner "New York Family Court · 1952
- Krakow v. KrakowNew York Family Court · 1950