Legal Opinion

Republic Creosoting Co. v. Hiatt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1937No. 26,857PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoll, J.

This is an action to recover damages resulting to appellee while working for and in the employee of appellant. The complaint is in two paragraphs and is of considerable length. We will epitomize sufficiently to make clear the questions presented. It is alleged that appellant is engaged in creosoting wooden blocks. That appellee was employed by appellant as a planer and that his regular employment in no way required him to handle or work with or near creosoted blocks, or that placed him in a position where he would breathe or come in contact with the fumes, gases and vapors from such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norwalk Truck Line Co. v. KostkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Norwalk Truck Line Co. v. KostkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API