Legal Opinion

Claim of Bache v. Salvation Army

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, P. J.:

The question in this case is whether the claimant was an employee of the Salvation Army. There is no dispute as to any material question of fact. The Salvation Army desired certain alterations to be made to its stock rooms and offices in its building at No, 126 *18West Fourteenth street, New York city. Mr. Wing was engaged in the carpenter business on his own account and had a place of business near the Salvation Army building. He was employed by the Salvation Army to make the desired alterations in its building. For that purpose he furnished all the labor and material. The work…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Uppington v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Matter of Litts v. . Risley Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Boyd v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Claim of Ball v. Estate of BertelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shannon v. Western Indemnity Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Ludlow v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Claim of Burns v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API