Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Southland Racing Corp.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 2, 1970No. 5-5148PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Geobge Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellee, South-land Racing Corporation, operates a greyhound race track in Crittenden county, with pari-mutuel betting, under the authority of Act 191 of 1957, as amended. Ark. Stat. Ann., Title 84, Ch. 28 (Repl. 1960). In 1969 the General Assembly amended the law to provide that all officers and directors of such greyhound dog tracks must be qualified electors of the State, must have resided in the county where the track is located for at least two years, and must maintain their residence in the county during their tenure in office. Act 285 of 1969; Ark. Stat.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hinebaugh v. JamesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Degrazier v. StephensTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- White v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Brown v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Wade v. HornerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patricia Moore-King v. County of Chesterfield, VACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Wometco Services, Inc. v. GaddySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Moore-King v. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VA.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.