Delmonico v. Crespo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
We grant respondent Donovan Marine’s motion for clarification, withdraw our opinion issued March 2, 2011, and replace it with the following opinion.
Petitioner, Daniel Delmonico, seeks cer-tiorari review of an order denying his motion for a protective order. Respondent, Donovan Marine, Inc., sought financial discovery of both petitioner and non-parties “in aid of execution” of an award of attorney’s fees. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.560.
Respondent asserts that this court, in a separate related case, ordered petitioner to pay attorney’s fees, in accordance with…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Friedman v. Heart Inst. of Port St. Lucie, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Posner de Mildenberg v. Grancolombiana Corporacion Financiera, S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986