Legal Opinion

Dictograph Products Company, Inc. v. Sonotone Corporation, Emil Henry Greibach and S. Michael Pineles

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 28, 1956No. 19-1967PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

On this appeal we may not consider any depositions or other evidence that were not filed in the district court when Judge Ryan decided the motion. It is true that under Rule 75(h) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., we may on our “own initiative” direct that “a supplemental record shall he certified and transmitted by the clerk of the district court”; but obviously that should comprise only such “records” as were before the district court itself, for this court has no jurisdiction save to correct errors, and it cannot be an error to ignore evidence never presented to the court. The…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. In re Motors Liquidation Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Wyler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API