Legal Opinion

Scope Imports, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1982No. 81-4318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

A tariff for ocean and rail movement of containers provides that demur-rage 1 begins five days after the “consignee is advised” that the containers are “available for customs inspection.” The consignee of a number of containers shipped to Houston, Texas, contends that the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC or Commission) erred in finding that it received adequate notice. The consignee also claims that, because customs inspectors in Houston will inspect containers only when they are delivered to the customs area, the ICC erred in finding that the containers were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. The Coca-Cola Company v. The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Knox Homes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A.J. Calhoun v. General Mills, Inc. (In re Gordon's Transports, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API