Legal Opinion

Conrad & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 28, 1931No. 2523PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for review, of certain orders and decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals holding that the petitioner was subject to certain deficiency taxes for the years 1919, 1920, 1921, and 1922.

The Board of Tax Appeals found as facts that prior to November 1, 1917, Sidney S. Conrad and Bertram B. Conrad conducted a business as partners under the name of Conrad & Co., and on the above date they organized a corporation and transferred to the corporation the tangible assets of the partnership consisting of cash, receivables, merchandise, and supplies which had an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Kendrick Coal & Dock Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. L. S. Plaut & Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United Aniline Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  2. Guggenheim v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Blackmer v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Moore. Moore v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Davison v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API