Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bryant v. Cadena Contracting, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 2007No. CA 07-376Published

1ConcurrenceSam Bird, Judge

I agree with the court’s decision but am concerned with the confusion caused by Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-115 for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Bryant v. Jim Atkinson Tile, 100 Ark. App. 408, 269 S.W.3d 383 (2007).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bryant v. Jim Atkinson TileCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007