Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Wise

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1908No. 1809PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in an appeal from Grayson County. The railway company appealed from a judgment recovered against it hy Wise, and on affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

Defendant in error, while in the service of plaintiff in error as brakeman, was hurt near Gibson in the Indian Territory on the 20th day of July, 1904, and afterwards brought this action and recovered the judgment now before us in Grayson County, Texas, for damages, on the ground that his injuries were caused by the negligence of the railway company. The evidence is sufficient to sustain his allegations that, in the proper discharge of his duties, he stood upon the step of the pilot of the engine drawing the train upon which he was acting as brakeman and, while riding.there in order to be in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Ralls v. RallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Givens v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Lamb v. HardyTexas Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API