Legal Opinion
Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC v. Jude's Barbershop, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-02688-CMA-BNBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND IMPROPER VENUE
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, District Judge.
In this trademark infringement dispute, Plaintiff Floyd’s 99 Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Floyd’s”) brings claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, and the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, as well as common law claims of unfair competition and trademark infringement. (Doc. # 1 at 6-7.) The matter currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue. (Doc. #…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Great Divide Brewing Co. v. Gold Key/PHR Food Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Active Athletics, LLC v. Active Gymnastics Center LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- Active Athletics, LLC v. Active Gymnastics Center LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Glovebox Technologies Inc. v. Da CruzDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- HappyFeet-Legends International, Inc. v. HoldawayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.