Sutton v. Hasey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from, the Circuit Court for Columbia, County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice TayloR: “The plaintiff had recovered judgment against the defendant Chapman for the sum of $837.93. Execution, had been duly issued on said judgment, and had not been returned when proceedings against the appellant, Hasey, were commenced under sec, 2753, E. S. 1878. The object of the' garnishee proceedings against Hasey was to subject certain property in his possession to the payment…
Read the full summary
APPEAL from, the Circuit Court for Columbia, County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice TayloR: “The plaintiff had recovered judgment against the defendant Chapman for the sum of $837.93. Execution, had been duly issued on said judgment, and had not been returned when proceedings against the appellant, Hasey, were commenced under sec, 2753, E. S. 1878. The object of the' garnishee proceedings against Hasey was to subject certain property in his possession to the payment of said judgment, on the ground that he had obtained such, property from the defendant Chapman by a sale which was…
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The learned counsel assigns as errors on this appeal that the circuit judge erroneously found the following as facts in the case: (1) That the value of the real estate conveyed by Chapman to Hasey was $6,630, and the personal property was of the value of $1,156.40; (2) that the total indebtedness and liability of Chapman to Hasey, including the $4,000 mortgage on the farm, was no more than $6,535.12, and that the value of the property, over and above such indebtedness, was the sum of $1,251.22; (3) that Chapman, on the day he made the deed and chattel mortgage, was otherwise largely indebted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ferguson v. HillmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Cairns v. O'BlenessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Norris v. PersonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- La Crosse National Bank v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- McIntosh v. Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Carter, Rittenberg & Hainlin Co. v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896