Teasley v. Mathis
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Undercofler, Presiding Justice.
Lucius Teasley, appellant, raised the question in the trial court whether the Georgia "no fault” automobile insurance law is unconstitutional because it disallows an accident victim who does not sustain "serious injury” from suing for exemplary damages. Summary judgment was granted against Teasley, sustaining the no fault law. He appeals. We affirm.
Teasley’s car was struck from behind by appellee Mathis’ while driving in Bibb County. Teasley’s losses, which did not include "serious injury” 1 under the statute, were paid by his insurer according to the Act.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Williams v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Cannon v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. ConkleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. NestlehuttSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Love v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Georgia Lions Eye Bank, Inc. v. LavantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.